Top 5 Congressional Republican
Votes No One Knows About ;
When Ignorance Isn't Bliss
By
Michael Dean
Between Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Chris Matthews, John Ashcroft's
terror warnings, "The Bachelor," the final episode of
"The Sopranos" and those incessant injury lawyer commercials,
voters in November are somehow expected to cast informed votes
for Congress.
We are supposed to base our decision on talking points parroted
to us by inane TV reporters or, worse, paid political ads.
Many people, of course, simply tune out and do not vote.
Those who do head to the polls often vote with little knowledge
of what their elected representatives are doing.
So, in an effort to cut through the din this year, here are five
congressional votes that everyone in America should know about.
They come straight from the you-can't-make-this-stuff-up file,
and capture how soundbite politics hide the troubling reality
behind conservatives' bumper-sticker slogans.
Pro-Defense: Facing increasing violence in Iraq, military commanders
in Iraq asked Congress and the president to immediately fill shortages
in protective body armor. Just four months after the president
signed another massive tax cut for the wealthy, up to 51,000 troops
were still not properly equipped for combat, with many begging
friends and family at home to buy them makeshift armor. Responding
to the crisis, Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) sponsored a bill to
immediately plug the shortage. He was voted down (Senate vote
#376, October 2, 2003), and the results have been catastrophic.
As a recent study circulating in the Army notes, up to one in
four casualties in Iraq was due to poor protective gear.
Compassionate: With U.S. troops struggling to secure Iraq last
summer, Congress and the president repeatedly praised soldiers'
efforts and promised to provide them the best facilities possible.
Yet, the White House budget that year proposed to cut $1.5 billion
out of military housing. Representative David Obey (D-Wisc.) came
up with a simple solution: Slightly reduce the proposed tax cuts
on the 200,000 Americans making $1 million a year to fill the
budget gap for the troops and their families. Instead of getting
an $88,000 tax cut, millionaires would receive an ample $83,000
tax cut, and the troops' housing would be maintained. Obey's bill
was voted down (House vote #324, June 26, 2003).
Tax Fairness: In 2002, the Bush administration terminated the
tax on oil and chemical industry polluters that finances Superfund
toxic cleanups. As the New York Times reported, the move effectively
"shifted the bulk of [cleanup] costs from industry to taxpayers,"
allowing the president's corporate campaign donors to pollute
without having to pay for it. Just two years later, the loss of
tax revenues bankrupted Superfund, leaving it unable to maintain
an adequate cleanup pace. In response, Senator Frank Lautenberg
(D-N.J.) offered an amendment to reinstate the Superfund tax.
He was voted down. (Senate vote #45, March 11, 2004), and now
more and more communities are forced to wait as toxic sites fester
in their midst.
Patrotism: As the recession reached new lows in December 2002,
the U.S. House of Representatives considered whether to continue
rewarding companies with taxpayer subsidies, even if those same
companies use those subsidies to send U.S. jobs overseas. The
question was simple: During a jobs and deficit crisis, should
the U.S. government's Export-Import Bank continue giving most
of its $15 billion a year to subsidize a slew of Fortune 500 companies
that are reducing their U.S. workforce? But when Representative
Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) offered a measure to curb the government
handouts to corporate job exporters, he was voted down (House
vote #120, May 1, 2002).
Clean Government: Halliburton, the oil company Vice President
Dick Cheney ran, continues to receive billions in no-bid government
contracts for work in Iraq, even after it was cited for overcharging
taxpayers and providing unsanitary facilities to U.S. troops.
At the same time, Cheney is receiving hundreds of thousands of
dollars in deferred compensation from the company and holds roughly
400,000 Halliburton stock options. More troubling, internal memos
now show that Cheney's office was directly coordinating Halliburton
contracts. When the Congressional Research Service ruled the situation
represented a "potential conflict of interest," the
Senate considered legislation that would have forced the termination
of the Cheney-Halliburton relationship. It was voted down (Senate
vote #386, October 16, 2003).
No doubt, most Americans have heard more about the president's
dog and jogging schedule than where their elected representatives
came down on these votes.
But that merely reflects the pathetic state of American journalism,
not the gravity or consequences of the decisions. No matter how
much we tell ourselves these votes and decisions don't matter,
they do. No matter how many times reporters tell us semen-stained
blue dresses and gossip are more important than lies about war,
peace, poverty and corruption, they're not.
The sooner we wake up and demand accountability at the polls,
the better.
|